Yes, Rymir & Wanda Satterthwaite along with Dr. Lillie Coley have filed Motions with NJ Supreme Court Seeking Corrections of Appellant Division Allowing Tainted and Incomplete Court Records along with Denial of Due Process in High Profile Case.
The Appellate Division is faced with the type of improper conduct by litigants and lawyers that tarnishes the justice system and makes for a dark day for all involved: the apparent submittal of documents presented to the Court. Presently on appeal, Shawn Carter & Attorney Fisher, the Respondents in CAM L-4749-14 - Lillie Coley vs Shawn Corey Carter & Lise Fisher, has three(3) main violations: 1) they added documents to their Appendix which was not a part of the record below, 2) adding a party such as Rymir to the appeal who was not a part of the instant case. Rymir was never served or included, and 3) Respondents submitted for 2nd time a manufactured fraudulent Order dated June 8, 2017 at which a police report was filed. 
In summation, documents which have been entered into the record by the Respondent are not a part of the record below filed with the Civil Law Court. These documents were not a part of the decision process of instant case at the trial level because they were not part record and NOT applicable to Civil Law case of L-4749-14 nor were the appeals derived from it. This instant appeal evolved from the Appellant Level due to the Civil Law Judge bypassed normal procedure to initiate a Protective Order without serving her the Orders. Such conduct by Respondents warrants the harshest of penalties, including striking the submissions from the Court’s record and imposing sanctions on the Respondents and his attorneys. Appellant further requests that default Judgment be entered against the Respondent and in favor of the Appellant, for reasons set forth further herein.
Parties have filed an inquiry with the Attorney General Offices in the appropriate jurisdictions and with Department of Justice regarding Civil Rights violations of individual rights based mainly on Retaliation with court protecting the interest of some parties while violating the rights of others.
This is not the first time the NJ court system has been brought into question. In 2015 a case involving NJ plaintiff Tobia Ippolito caused an outcry when a tape in court recorded the Defendant’s lawyer saying, “Whatever I ask, he (the County Prosecutor) does.” The case and several others like it, are the reason why the FCLU remains dedicated in its mission to help families get the justice they seek.
About FCLU
Based in New York City, the aim of the Families Civil Liberties Union (FCLU) is to protect families against the family court system and prevent it from defrauding them and ensure they get justice. The politically neutral organization uses several tools in its arsenal to ensure families have the law on their side. This includes the press, education, legislation, litigation as well as proactive checks and balances to fix the family court system from the inside out.
Media Contact: Dr. Shar Handy, President FCLU Philadelphia Chapter
Email: fclu.phila2@gmail.com
Website: http://www.fclu.org/